Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ricardas Berankis vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Berankis vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Ricardas Berankis vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Berankis 2 - 2 Ilkel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Berankis has won 50.84% of points on their second serve, while Ilkel has won 46.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Berankis, in recent form, has won 53.64% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 50.73%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.93% and 25.25% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Berankis has saved 61.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 51.97% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Berankis has won 58.62% of matches played (W/L 34/ 24), with Ilkel winning 40.82% (W/L 20/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Berankis has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 218/ 107), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 71/ 66). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 166), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Berankis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.18% of matches (W/L 32/ 23), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.71% of matches (W/L 12/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Berankis winning 2 times and Ilkel being victorious 2 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Berankis winning 6 and Ilkel winning 5. The last match between Berankis and Ilkel was at the Seoul Challenger, 26-04-2023, First, Hard with Ricardas Berankis getting the victory 6-7(2) 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Berankis and Ilkel have played a deciding set 3 times, with Berankis winning 1 times and Ilkel 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Berankis winning 0, and Ilkel 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Berankis has played against opponents with an average rank of 340.66 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 240.37.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Berankis has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Berankis has converted 40.88% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 39.18% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
275
Rank
50
High
34
Age
R
Plays
2
Total2
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
407
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
60% (582-385)
Career Total W/L
56% (401-315)
64% (27-15)
YTD W/L
36% (9-16)
$2,395,158
Career Prize Money
$225,530
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ricardas Berankis vs Cem Ilkel For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Berankis VS Ilkel
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Ricardas Berankis | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 5 |
| Games Won | 55 | 49 |
| Aces (Total) | 16 | 30 |
| DFs Total | 12 | 23 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:48 | 1:58:48 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (210/332) | 57% (194/341) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (147/210) | 69% (134/194) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (56/122) | 39% (58/147) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (17/32) | 43% (13/30) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (149/341) | 39% (129/332) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(2) 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
9
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
40%
(
14 of
35)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
51
Total Points Won
22
|
||||
| 6-2 5-7 7-6(3) |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Ricardas Berankis
57%
(
65 of
114)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
118)
14
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
50 of
75)
39%
(
19 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
46 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
118)
120
Total Points Won
112
|
||||
| 6-2 4-6 6-2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Ricardas Berankis
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
11
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
33 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ricardas Berankis | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (27/15) | 36% (9/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (60/42) | 36% (20/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (522/457) | 44% (219/281) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 33% (4/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 63% (10/6) | 45% (5/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.48 |
| Aces Total | 172 | 117 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 111 | 53 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:50 | 1:28:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 292.62 | 190.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1734/2928) | 57% (879/1532) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (1227/1734) | 69% (610/879) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (607/1194) | 47% (305/653) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (130/318) | 39% (38/97) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1219/3015) | 35% (505/1447) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (25/15) | 41% (7/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (26/41) | 33% (8/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 69% (11/16) | 83% (5/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 65% (11/17) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (25/22) | 70% (10/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (25/3) | 30% (10/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (17/5) | 13% (15/2) |
Ricardas Berankis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Calvin Hemery
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
11
Aces
15
1
Double Faults
4
89%
(
41 of
46)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
39 of
44)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
12 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
18 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Jules Marie
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Federico Iannaccone
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Arthur Gea
46%
(
28 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
10
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
8
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Ricardas Berankis
53%
(
58 of
109)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
106)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
34 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Ricardas Berankis
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Ricardas Berankis
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Antoine Escoffier
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Brandon Holt
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
76%
(
41 of
54)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Berankis Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Berankis are available here and Ilkel photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
